Translator’s Foreword
§ 1. To be human already means to philosophize
5§ 2. To introduce means: To get philosophizing underway
6§ 3. The preunderstanding of philosophy
8§ 4. How does philosophy relate to science, Weltanschauung, and history?
§ 5. Is philosophy a science?
16§ 6. Ancient and modern conceptions of philosophy
17§ 7. The expression “philosophy”
§ 8. Provisional question concerning the essence of science in terms of the crisis of science
22a) The crisis in the relationship of the individual to science
24b) The crisis of science with regard to its position in the whole of our historical and social existence
27c) The crisis within the inner structure of the essence of science itself
30§ 9. A new reflection on the essence of science
32a) Science as methodological, systematic, exact, and universally valid knowledge
33b) Science and truth—Adaequatio intellectus ad rem
34§ 10. Truth as propositional truth
36a) The traditional concept of truth
37b) Truth as feature of a proposition: The connecting of subject and predicate
41c) The approach to the problem of truth in antiquity
45§ 11. On the problem of the subject-object relation. Predicative and veritative relation
§ 12. The original essence of truth
50a) Going back behind the subject-object relation: Being alongside . . .
52b) Being alongside . . . as a determination of Dasein’s existence
54c) Beings as they make themselves known in contexts of involvement
55d) Truth as unconcealment. Various ways in which beings are manifest
59§ 13. The original essence of truth
61a) Being present at hand together—Being with one another
63b) Being with one another: Several comporting themselves toward the same
66c) Sameness
69d) The same as common
72e) Is partaking something common?
72f) Of the letting be of things
75§ 14. We share in the unconcealment of beings
76a) Being with one another is a sharing in truth
78b) The unconcealment of what is present at hand
80c) The belonging of truth to Dasein does not declare truth to be something “subjectivistic”
83d) Being alongside what is present at hand and being with one another belong equiprimordially to the essence of Dasein
85e) The being uncovering of Dasein. The truth of what is present at hand and ready to hand as uncoveredness
§ 15. Being uncovering in early human and early childhood Dasein
89§ 16. The uncoveredness of what is present at hand and the manifestness of Dasein
93§ 17. The manifestness of Dasein qua Da-sein
97§ 18. Dasein and being-with
100§ 19. Leibniz’s Monadology and the interpretation of being with one another
102§ 20. Community on the grounds of the with-one-another
§ 21. Summary of the interpretation of truth
110§ 22. Determining the essence of science in terms of the originary concept of truth
111a) Science as a kind of truth?
112b) Prescientific and scientific Dasein
116c) Scientific truth
117§ 23. Science as a possible fundamental stance of human existence. Βίος θεωρητικός—Vita contemplativa
121§ 24. The original belonging together of theory and praxis in θεωρεῖν as making beings manifest
125§ 25. Construction of the essence of science
125a) Being-in-the-truth for the sake of truth
127b) The originary action. The letting be of beings
128§ 26. The change in the understanding of being in the scientific projection. The new determination of beings as nature
132a) How the understanding of being precedes every conceptual comprehending
134b) The change in our understanding of being: An example from physics
136c) The positivity of science. The antecedent, nonobjective projection of the constitution of being that demarcates a field
§ 27. The projection of the constitution of being pertaining to beings as the inner enabling of positivity, that is, of the essence of science. Preontological and ontological understanding of being
141§ 28. Ontic and ontological truth. Truth and transcendence of Dasein
149§ 29. Philosophizing as transcending belongs to the essence of human Dasein
151§ 30. The different realms of questioning in philosophy and science
154§ 31. A summary of what has been presented. The understanding of being as the primordial fact of Dasein: The possibility of the ontological difference. The ontological difference and the distinction between philosophy and science
§ 32. What is Weltanschauung?
161a) The word Weltanschauung
165b) Interpretations of Weltanschauung: Dilthey—Jaspers—Scheler
168§ 33. What is meant by world?
169a) The concept of world in ancient philosophy and in early Christianity
171b) The concept of world in Scholastic metaphysics
174§ 34. Kant’s concept of world
177a) Kant’s concept of world in the Critique of Pure Reason
180b) Excursus: Kant’s laying the ground for metaphysics
181α) The main theses
184β) The execution
192c) Excursus: Kant’s Dialectic
194d) Kant’s concept of ‘idea’
201e) World as the idea of the totality of appearances: Correlate of finite human knowledge
202f) Idea and ideal. The full determination of the concept of world as a transcendental ideal
207g) The existentiell signification of the concept of world
§ 35. Dasein as being-in-the-world
215§ 36. World as “play of life”
216a) Being-in-the-world as the original play of transcendence
219b) Transcendence qua understanding of being as play
220c) The correlation of being and thinking. Its narrowing in the “logical” interpretation of the understanding of being
225§ 37. Achieving a more concrete understanding of transcendence
225a) Selfhood (for the sake of oneself) as determining the being of Dasein. Exposure as an intrinsic determination of being-in-the-world
228b) Exposure as thrownness
230c) Facticity and thrownness. The nihilative character and finitude of Dasein. Dissemination and individuation
234d) The lack of hold pertaining to being-in-the-world
235§ 38. The structural character of transcendence
235a) Retrospect on the structural character of being-in-the-world attained
237b) Weltanschauung as holding oneself in being-in-the-world
§ 39. Fundamental questions regarding the principle problem of Weltanschauung
239a) Weltanschauung as factically engaged being-in-the-world
241b) The concept of Weltanschauung in Dilthey
246§ 40. How does Weltanschauung relate to philosophizing?
246a) The ordinary form of the problem: Can and should philosophy construct a scientific Weltanschauung?
247b) On the historicality of Weltanschauungen
248§ 41. Two fundamental possibilities of Weltanschauung
248a) Weltanschauung in myth: Shelter as a hold amid overwhelming beings themselves
252b) The degeneration of shelter: Weltanschauung that has become busyness
254§ 42. The other fundamental possibility: Weltanschauung as held bearing
254a) Weltanschauung as held bearing and the confrontation with beings arising from it
257b) Weltanschauung as held bearing and the transformation of truth as such
258c) Forms of degeneration of Weltanschauung as held bearing
261§ 43. On the inner relationship between Weltanschauung as a held bearing and philosophy
261a) On the problematic of this relationship
263b) Philosophy is Weltanschauung as held bearing in an exceptional sense
265§ 44. In Weltanschauung as held bearing the problem of being irrupts
266a) The awakening of the problem of being from Weltanschauung within myth as sheltering
268b) Historical forms of development of philosophy from Weltanschauung as sheltering and held bearing
§ 45. The problem of being and the problem of world
272a) The question of being as a question concerning ground and the problem of world
274b) In the problem of being and the problem of world, transcendence brings itself to conceptual unfolding
276§ 46. Philosophy as held bearing in relation to ground: Letting transcendence happen from out of its ground
Editors’ Epilogue
283German–English Glossary
291English–German Glossary